USPTO serial 98082475
CONSTRUCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHAEFER, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSTRUCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carissa L. Weiss
Carissa L. Weiss LAW OFFICE OF CARISSA L. WEISS, PLLC745 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 500NEW YORK, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing an Internet website portal featuring educational instruction relating to the use of application programming interface (API) software for performing Internet searches; providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles about improving search engine relevance and ranking and using artificial intelligence and machine learning to facilitate ecommerce transactions; education services, namely, providing online, non-downloadable webinars in the field of search engine relevance and ranking and using artificial intelligence and machine learning to facilitate ecommerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in supporting and enhancing ecommerce activity by enabling businesses to employ generative artificial intelligence technology to offer tailored and personalized search and product discovery on ecommerce websites; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for perfecting search and discovery of site-specific and term-specific Internet search engine queries and results by enabling businesses to employ generative artificial intelligence technology to offer tailored and personalized search and product discovery on ecommerce websites; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for improving search engine relevance and ranking; providing search engine services for others for use with specific websites; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve and perfect search and discovery of site-specific and term-specific Internet search engine queries and results; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence software customization; design and development of computer software; technical project studies in the nature of technological research in the field of computer programming; development, design, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; computer programming; computer programming consultancy; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |