USPTO serial 98243534
KITTYSAURUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRELL, LUCY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITTYSAURUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip Sanberg
Phillip Sanberg Lamson Dugan & Murray LLP10306 Regency Parkway DriveOmaha, NE 68114United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Beanies; Hats; Pants; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Slippers; Socks; Sweatshirts; Athletic shirts; Athletic shorts; Baseball caps and hats; Caps with visors; Golf caps; Graphic T-shirts; Hooded sweat shirts; Hooded sweatshirts; Jogging pants; Long-sleeved shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Short-sleeve shirts; Slipper socks; Sports caps and hats; Stocking caps; Stocking hats; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tank tops; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 2023 |
| 028 | Action figure toys; Action figures; Action figures and accessories therefor; Board games; Card games; Collectable toy figures; Jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; Jigsaw puzzles; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Play figures; Plush dolls; Plush toys; Positionable toy figures; Stuffed and plush toys; Tabletop games; Toy figures; Toy action figures | ACTIVE | Jan 6, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2024 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |