USPTO serial 98246949
MOTOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent LaBarge
Brent LaBarge UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP222 COLORADO AVENUESANTA MONICA, CA 90404United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; beer-based beverages; non-alcoholic beers; sports drinks; energy drinks; mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic cocktails; non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; fruit-flavored beverages; soft drinks; soda pops; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups, powders, concentrates, and other preparations for making sports drinks, energy drinks, non-alcoholic cocktails, carbonated beverages, fruit-flavored beverages, soft drinks, and soda pops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |