Drawing for GROQ

USPTO serial 98273666

GROQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POMEROY-MURPHY, KAITLIN I
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Betsy P. Bengtson

Betsy P. Bengtson KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600Denver, CO 80202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Online non-downloadable software for use in natural language processing, machine learning, voice command and recognition, converting speech to text, data analytics, and artificial intelligence; Online non-downloadable software for use in natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis relating to automatically generating computer software; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for use in natural language processing, machine learning, voice command and recognition, converting speech to text, data analytics, and artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for use in natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis relating to automatically generating computer software; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in natural language processing, machine learning, voice command and recognition, converting speech to text, data analytics, and artificial intelligence; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in natural language processing, generation, understanding and analysis relating to automatically generating computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 4, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 30, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance