USPTO serial 98670956
MONETACLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, DIANA ALANA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONETACLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Jeppsen
Eric Jeppsen BTJD3165 E. Millrock DriveSuite 500Salt Lake City, UT 84121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for financial management of technology solutions, namely software that allows users of cloud infrastructure and cloud- related technology services to optimize their cloud spend and enable more efficient investment in cloud and cloud-related technologies, including improvements to overall technology expenditures; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring cloud-computing performance metrics and analyzing, evaluating, scoring, tracking, and optimizing cloud spend based on the same; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing, evaluating, scoring, and tracking cloud infrastructure services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data analysis and expense management in the field of cloud infrastructure; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of software and SAAS licenses, namely, software for tracking licenses, optimizing license purchases, and evaluating and recommending contract terms; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud-computing management, namely software for reducing cloud spend with automated cloud operations and cloud governance control; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for financial management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend governance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend maintenance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend governance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud spend maintenance. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |