USPTO serial 98683153
TAVOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WICKERSHAM, JUSTIN SPENCER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TAVOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grosse Pointe, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca L. Wilson
Rebecca L. Wilson The Dobrusin Law Firm, P.C.29 West Lawrence StreetSuite 210Pontiac, MI 48342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic advertisement and messaging display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities and remote connectivity; Computer hardware for IP video surveillance; electronic advertisement and messaging display units; computer hardware devices with embedded electric sensors and cameras; cloud based computer software for image and sensor data processing; computer systems comprised of remote hardware devices with embedded electric sensors and cameras connected to backend servers for data analysis and interface; cloud based computer operating programs; cloud based computer software featuring mathematical algorithms and indices for use in analyzing image and sensor data; cloud based computer software for processing digital images; recorded computer operating programs; cloud based Computer software and hardware for monitoring and managing table game operations in a casino | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2025 |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for facilitating play at table games, for gathering information about play at table games, and for facilitating the electronic transfer of funds for players of table games; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in image and sensor data processing; computer hardware and software design; computer software installation and maintenance; computer software design for image and sensor data processing; providing temporary use of online, non- downloadable computer operating programs; providing temporary use of online, nondownloadable computer software for processing digital images; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer for monitoring and managing table game operations in a casino | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |