USPTO serial 98891718
HOMECORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOMECORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Enshan Hong
Enshan Hong Magstone Law, LLP293 Eisenhower Pkwy, Suite 135LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Home security alarm systems comprised of voice-activated speakers, computer hardware, and downloadable software for controlling networked devices in the internet of things (IoT), operating internet-enabled and connected lighting apparatus and home security alarms; security alarm control panels; burglar security alarm; electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic components of security systems; electronic security and surveillance devices, namely, electronic security tags and labels, acoustic tags, magnetic tags; closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; electronic base station for home security systems, namely, a central control unit being an electronic control panel for connecting, monitoring, and managing home security devices and systems, namely, security cameras, motion sensors, and alarm systems; computer hardware for security data storage; electronic security data storage devices, namely, blank flash drives, hard disk drives, and solid state drives; electronic devices for storing and securing digital data, namely, encrypted storage drives for storing electronic data, network-attached storage (NAS) devices being computer hardware for data storage and retrieval, and external computer hard drives designed for the storage of security camera footage and other surveillance data; hardware, namely, computer hardware for data storage and security system management and downloadable software for managing, encrypting, and retrieving stored security footage; home security devices and systems, namely, electronic alarm systems being motion sensors, infrared sensors, and vibration sensors for detecting unauthorized entry and electric control panels being computer hardware for monitoring and controlling home security components, door and window sensors for detecting intrusion, surveillance cameras, video doorbells, electronic locks, and central control panels being computer hardware for monitoring and controlling home security systems; downloadable software for monitoring, controlling, and managing home security systems; electronic devices, namely computer hardware for the remote operation of home security systems, namely, mobile and web-based interfaces; device, namely computer hardware with integrated memory used to sync security cameras and store security camera footage; electronic devices for synchronizing security cameras and storing security camera footage, namely, hardware being networked digital video recorders (DVRs) and computer hardware for video data storage and downloadable software for managing, storing, and accessing video surveillance data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |