Drawing for DIRECT PURE

USPTO serial 99001781

DIRECT PURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARMON KENNEDY, HEATHER N
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECT PURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anton Leonov

Anton Leonov Trademark Garden, PLLC3104 E Camelback Rd #2373Phoenix, AZ 85016United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water purifying apparatus; Water purification unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance