USPTO serial 99074013
PSILLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PSILLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica C. Engler
Jessica C. Engler Kean Miller, LLP400 Convention Street, Suite 700Baton Rouge, LA 70802United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic flavored carbonated beverages; Seltzer water; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Preparations for making non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; all of the foregoing not including ingredients from psilocybin; non-alcoholic carbonated beverages containing CBD derived only from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Non-alcoholic flavored carbonated beverages containing CBD derived only from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Seltzer water containing CBD derived only from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages containing CBD derived only from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Preparations for making non-alcoholic carbonated beverages containing CBD derived only from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |