USPTO serial 99236171
ZERO-SHOT AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZERO-SHOT AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R MENKER
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, PA60 Ocean Boulevard, Suite 3Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for designing, programming, installation, operation and maintenance of machines used in automated manufacturing; Recorded and downloadable computer software for operating machines used in automated manufacturing; Recorded computer software for automation of industrial machines sold as an embedded component of electronic controllers and electronic motor drives | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Advisory services relating to the installation and maintenance of machines used in automated manufacturing; Computer installation; Maintenance of automated computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware design; Computer software programming; Design and programming of machines used in automated manufacturing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in a cloud infrastructure for designing, programming, installation, and maintenance of machines used in automated manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |