USPTO serial 99239847
SEA SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 612
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEA SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Jensen-Haxel
PO Box 1353Ashland, OR 97520United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded software for maritime threat intelligence; Recorded software for command and control of unmanned aerial vehicles; Recorded software for navigation, control, and autonomous piloting of drones; Downloadable video and audio files relating to drones, surveillance footage, and audiovisual surveillance recordings; Recorded artificial intelligence and machine learning software for piloting and controlling drones and unmanned aerial vehicles UAVs; Recorded software for vessel and watercraft surveillance, defense, and defense coordination; Recorded software for controlling surveillance and early warning systems in the field of maritime security; Recorded artificial intelligence and machine learning software for detecting and identifying maritime security and watercraft piracy threats | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of maritime safety, maritime security, and vessel anti-piracy; Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) software training services, namely, training maritime security and anti-piracy software systems; AI and ML software training services, namely, training maritime security and piracy threat detection and recognition systems; SAAS services featuring maritime threat intelligence; SAAS services featuring vessel and watercraft surveillance, threat detection, and defense coordination; SAAS services featuring software for command and control of unmanned aerial vehicles for surveillance, threat detection, and threat mitigation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring flight control computer software for piloting drones and unmanned aircraft; SAAS services featuring AI and ML software for detecting and identifying maritime security and watercraft piracy threats | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Surveillance services by drone, namely, providing security personnel for commercial shipping and private watercraft; Security services for the protection of oceangoing vessels in transit; Consulting services in the area of maritime security, including performing shipboard threat assessments; Intelligence reporting, namely, providing threat assessment and security information to marine and maritime operations, security planning and crisis response planning; Anti-piracy services, namely, providing drone response teams for maritime vessel protection; Anti-piracy services, namely, providing watercraft and commercial vessel crew augmentation security teams; Providing reconnaissance and surveillance services; Surveillance services by drone; Security services, namely, armed escorts and security personnel for commercial shipping and private watercraft; Security services, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery of property and personnel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |