Drawing for AIVATAR

USPTO serial 99244083

AIVATAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 645Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BACZESKI, LILLIANNA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 645: Status 645 means the USPTO mailed a final refusal maintaining at least one objection to your application. You can respond, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or allow the application to abandon.

Need help with AIVATAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hillel I Parness

Hillel I Parness PARNESS LAW FIRM, PLLC136 Madison Ave., 6th FloorNew York, NY 10016United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile applications for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collection using artificial intelligence; Computer hardware for audio production, and for creating, converting, editing, composing, mixing and manipulating audio signals; Computer hardware with preinstalled software for audio production, and for creating, converting, editing, composing, mixing and manipulating audio signals; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collectionACTIVE—
036Collecting license fees on behalf of independent writers and publishers and making payments to the copyright owners of the musicACTIVE—
042Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collection; Providing subscription-based temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collection using artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collection using artificial intelligence; Providing subscription-based temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for music creation, music licensing, copyright licensing, royalty identification, and royalty collection using artificial intelligenceACTIVE—
045Music licensing services; Intellectual property licensing services; Copyright licensing agency services; Licensing of copyrightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 22, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Feb 17, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance