Drawing for AMPULSE

USPTO serial 99306521

AMPULSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASTEE, BRIAN JAMES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 134

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMPULSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cami L. Boyd

Cami L. Boyd Musgrove Law Firm, P.C.10000 N. Central ExpresswaySuite 1000Dallas, TX 75231

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, automated perfusion systems comprised primarily of physiologic sensors, monitoring modules, electronic controllers, communications interface hardware, computer hardware, recorded operating software, sensor-integration hardware, user-interface components, and integrated control modules for use during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures for the monitoring and modulating of oxygen delivery, calculation of oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER), and initiation of automated interventions, namely, transfusion, ultrafiltration, and temperature controlACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 12, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance