USPTO serial 99323267
VERTICALVECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 688Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, JAYLEN SYLVIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with VERTICALVECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $249*
Plus Government fees of $150
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH, US
Cleveland, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan M. Mischler
Megan M. Mischler Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 1100Washington SquareWashington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an online non-downloadable computer software platform using artificial intelligence which serves as a secure productivity hub for analyzing data to uncover business trends, risks, and opportunities, for scrutinizing operational and financial data to uncover cost-saving strategies, for personalized client engagement, for accelerated content creation, and for optimizing business workflows and enhancing productivity; Development of computer software, namely, designing custom generative artificial intelligence software solutions for others; Providing online non-downloadable software platforms for analyzing business data, automating business tasks, and analyzing sales data, featuring custom generative artificial intelligence solutions to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |