USPTO serial 99401050
MRBEAST MODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, GILLIAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MRBEAST MODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenville, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RYAN MATHEW KAISER
RYAN MATHEW KAISER AMIN WASSERMAN GURNANI, LLP230 W. Monroe St.Suite 1405Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Distribution of videos via the Internet and via mobile platforms in the field of lifestyle, science, education, humor, comedy, stunts, challenges and monetary giveaways, and reviews and experiments that test life hacks, popular beliefs, urban legends and misconceptions; Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of lifestyle, science, education, humor, comedy, stunts, challenges and monetary giveaways, reviews and experiments that test life hacks, popular beliefs, urban legends and misconceptions, food reviews, cooking competitions, food-related content, and travel; Providing non-downloadable on-line videos in the field of science, education, humor, comedy, stunts, challenges and monetary giveaways, and reviews and experiments that test life hacks, popular beliefs, urban legends and misconceptions; Production of video recordings for the internet in the field of science, education, general entertainment, humor, comedy, stunts, challenges and monetary giveaways, and reviews and experiments that test life hacks, popular beliefs, urban legends and misconceptions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |