USPTO serial 99457018
PLUVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLUVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Thomas
Brian D. Thomas Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green PA1000 Elm StreetPO Box 3701Manchester, NH 03105-3701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for decision making in the field of business management relating to business strategy, business goals and initiatives, financial budgeting, financial forecasting, financial modeling, marketing, human resources, product management, product lifecycle management, and sales; downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for integrating data related to marketing, business operations, human resources, sales, and product management; downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for maintaining history of business decisions and rationales of business decisions; downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for financial planning and financial analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) services featuring computer software that uses artificial intelligence for decision making in the field of business management relating to business strategy, business goals and initiatives, financial budgeting, financial forecasting, financial modeling, marketing, human resources, product management, product lifecycle management, and sales; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) services featuring computer software that uses artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for integrating data related to marketing, business operations, human resources, sales, and product management; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) services featuring computer software that uses artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for maintaining history of business decisions and rationales; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) services featuring computer software that uses artificial intelligence for business management purposes, namely, for financial planning and financial analysis; implementation of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |