USPTO serial 99514297
TECHTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Holladay, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax D. Anderson
Dax D. Anderson Kirton McConkieKey Bank Tower36 South State Street, Suite 1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for assisting with construction project management and selecting construction materials and designs, for use by architects, building designers, general contractors, home builders, and real estate developers; none of the foregoing being engineering consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for assisting with construction project management and selecting construction materials and designs, for use by architects, building designers, general contractors, home builders, and real estate developers; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in providing designing and building services, for use by architects, building designers, general contractors, home builders, and real estate developers; Residential building design; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to post items for sale and buy items posted by others in the field of new or used brick, stone and other building materials; none of the foregoing being engineering consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |