USPTO serial 99561405
MNTN PERFORMANCE TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEICHTER, KENNETH HOWARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MNTN PERFORMANCE TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN C. SEREBOFF
STEVEN C. SEREBOFF SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP310 N. WESTLAKE BLVD., SUITE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Ad serving, namely, placing advertisements on websites for others using specialized computer software; Development of internet advertising concepts; Internet advertising services; Marketing research services in the nature of tracking consumer behavior and analyzing consumer trends; Preparation of custom advertisements for others; Preparing and placing advertisements for others; Advertising and advertisement services; Advertising by transmission of on-line publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; Advertising, including on-line advertising on a computer network; Business monitoring and consulting services, namely, tracking web sites and applications of others to provide strategy, insight, marketing, sales, operation, product design, particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions; Business monitoring services, namely, tracking web sites of others to provide details about user click traffic or visits to the web site; Online advertising on a computer network; Targeted marketing services; Advertising on the Internet for others; Marketing services; Television advertising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |