USPTO serial 99591425
GUIDE EYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUIDE EYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Willoughby, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Goodman
Kevin M. Goodman Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP38210 Glenn Ave.Willoughby, OH 44094United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cloud computing infrastructure consisting of computer hardware and downloadable computer software for connecting, monitoring and managing machine vision systems consisting of 2d and/or 3d non-contact optical sensors, machine vision cameras and image processing devices; downloadable visualization and predictive alert computer software for monitoring and managing 2d and/or 3d non-contact optical sensors, machine vision cameras and image processing devices in a machine vision solution; vision inspection system comprised of computer hardware and a machine vision camera; vision inspection system comprised primarily of optical inspection apparatus for industrial use for dimensional inspection of manufactured components; optical inspection apparatus; machine vision inspection system comprised of computer hardware and a machine vision camera; machine vision inspection system comprised primarily of optical inspection apparatus, laser scanners, sensors, and recorded software for robot guidance, part detection, and pic-and-place automation; recorded computer software for use in connection with machine vision inspection system for robot guidance, part detection, and pic-and-place automation; downloadable computer software for use in connection with machine vision inspection system for robot guidance, part detection, and pic-and-place automation; downloadable computer software for use with industrial machine vision cameras for real-time and inline production inspection and control; machine vision camera system comprised of computer hardware and a machine vision camera; machine vision camera system, comprised of an optical lens, lighting, and microprocessor for industrial use; computer hardware and downloadable computer software for operating, monitoring, recording, analyzing and transmitting information generated by machine vision camera systems with respect to industrial use; accessories for machine vision cameras, namely, cables, optical lenses and power supplies; and machine vision cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |