Drawing for COOKTECH

USPTO serial 99618561

COOKTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARRISON, EMMA BROOKE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 138

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lin Shan

1401 21st ST #13447Sacramento, CA 95811United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrical coffee grinders; Kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; Coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; Fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; Food processors, electric; Electric egg beaters; Electric coffee grinders; Electric food slicers; Juice machines; Electric mixers for household purposes; Lapping machines; Electric food blenders; Electric juicers; Electric kitchen mixers; Electric food blenders for household purposesACTIVENov 26, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance