USPTO serial 99636134
PETSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHONG, JESSICA EUNKYO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PETSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW HOMYK
MATTHEW HOMYK BLANK ROME LLPOne Logan Square, 130 North 18th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating programs, recorded; Downloadable computer operating programs; Recorded computer operating software; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for use in electronic storage of data relating to pets and animals; Sensors for determining position; Alarm sensors; Electric sensors; Timing sensors; Global positioning system (GPS); GPS navigation device; GPS tracking devices for pets; GPS tracking collars for pets; Transmitter and receiver used to locate lost pets; Data processing apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application and database integration; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring machine learning software for enabling computers to learn to perform tasks autonomously; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for time-tracking; Information and advisory services relating to software as a service (SAAS); Information services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services in the nature of hosting cloud-based software of others; Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software platforms for the transmission of audio recordings, audiovisual materials, video files; Computer software design; Updating of computer software; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Providing virtual computer systems through cloud computing; Information technology consulting relating to computer software design; Research services in the field of information and telecommunications technology; Providing scientific research information in the field of blockchain technology; Quality control of goods and services; Industrial design; Biological research; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for analyzing data and interacting with humans; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for database management; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Research in the field of deep learning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |