USPTO serial 99647572
PERDUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PERDUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salisbury, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Liebowitz
Rebecca Liebowitz Venable LLPPO Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sandwiches; Sandwiches containing meat; Sandwiches, namely, chicken sandwiches; Sauces; Dipping sauces; Processed grains; Processed grains, namely, corn, soy, canola, sunflower, wheat, barley and sorghum | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Raw and unprocessed grains; Agricultural grains for planting; Unprocessed grains, namely, corn, soy, canola, sunflower, wheat, barley and sorghum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |