Drawing for REVEL

USPTO serial 99654612

REVEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUIZ SANTIAGO, REBECCA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 130

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REVEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC L ADLER

ERIC L ADLER PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for showcasing use cases for application programming interface (API) software; Downloadable computer software for creating, managing, validating, and publishing application programming interface (API) software documentation and developer portals; Downloadable computer software for transforming application programming interface (API) software specifications into interactive reference documentation; Downloadable computer software for collaborative application programming interface (API) software design, editing, review, and version control; Downloadable computer software for linting, testing, and quality-checking application programming interface (API) software descriptions and implementations; Downloadable computer software for cataloging application programming interface (API) software and related technical assets and for providing search and analytics across application programming interface (API) software documentation.ACTIVEDec 1, 2021
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for showcasing use cases for application programming interface (API) software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, managing, validating, and publishing application programming interface (API) software documentation and developer portals; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for transforming application programming interface (API) software specifications into interactive reference documentation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for collaborative application programming interface (API) software design, editing, review, and version control; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for linting, testing, and quality-checking application programming interface (API) software descriptions and implementations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cataloging application programming interface (API) software and related technical assets and for providing search and analytics across application programming interface (API) software documentationACTIVEDec 1, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance