USPTO serial 99680862
LERI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELMAN, JESSE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LERI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dublin, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW NEAL SPIVAK
ANDREW NEAL SPIVAK MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP, PLLC4300 Fordham Road, NW, Suite 250Washington, DC 20016-1950United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cybersecurity services, namely, computer security consultancy in the nature of providing external risk intelligence assessments relating to computer hardware and software for organizations; conducting computer security threat analysis for the protection of publicly available and open-source data intelligence to identify externally exposed cyber risks, security gaps, system misconfigurations, digital exposures, and internet-facing assets; providing user authentication of domain and email security configurations using single sign-on technology for online software applications; Monitoring of computer systems to detect cybersecurity incidents in the nature of assessing externally observable technologies, computer and software services, and authentication computer access points; Computer security threat analysis for the protection of data in the nature of analyzing data for historical and legacy external risk indicators; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerabilities and providing risk scoring regarding the same; technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |