USPTO serial 99695435
HARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexis N. Degler
Alexis N. Degler Barnes & Thornburg1 N. Wacker DriveSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | smart speakers, namely, voice-activated speakers, audio devices, namely, microphones for ambient voice capture; smart home hubs comprised of voice-activated speakers, computer hardware, and recorded software for voice recognition, natural language processing, responding to user inquiries, providing information, performing voice-activated commands, and controlling connected smart home devices; voice-controlled electronic devices for voice recognition, natural language processing, responding to user inquiries, providing information, performing voice-activated commands, and controlling connected smart home devices; microphones; electronic audio apparatus for voice recognition, natural language processing; digital audio players; portable media players; wireless speakers; smart displays, namely, tablets, speakers and miniature robots with integrated voice control; humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for voice recognition, natural language processing, responding to user inquiries, providing information, performing voice-activated commands, and controlling connected smart home devices; robots for processing voice queries and generating audio responses, namely, personal and social robots featuring artificial intelligence; wireless controllers for smart devices and audio equipment to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; wireless controllers for audio input and output devices to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; wearable computers and electronic devices in the nature of smartwatches, smart rings, smart eyewear; wireless receivers; wearable activity trackers; wearable digital electronic devices, namely, smartwatches for voice communication; earbuds; headphones; voice-enabled personal assistant in the nature of smartwatches, smart rings, smart eyewear | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, namely, rings, necklaces, bracelets, watches and earrings; jewelry cases for jewelry, namely, rings, necklaces, bracelets, watches and earrings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |