Drawing for FLAVOR HOUSE

USPTO serial 99730895

FLAVOR HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRUCHON, MAYA J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLAVOR HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

John C. Cain Munck Wilson Mandala LLP1330 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2850Houston, TX 77056United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Common salt for cooking; Mineral salt for human consumption; Salt; Salt for flavoring food; Table saltACTIVEMar 31, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance