USPTO serial 50002728
APEX PRIME OPTIMIZED FOR XCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTIERREZ, GREGORY T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with APEX PRIME OPTIMIZED FOR XCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denver, CO, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Brewer
Peter L. Brewer Thrive IP8903 Linksvue DriveGettysvue CenterKnoxville, TN 37922Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Perforating gun systems for use in the perforating of casing during oil and gas well completions, the systems comprising detonators and explosive shaped charges; Oil field equipment carrier assemblies comprised of explosive charges and detonators contained within prewired tubular subs in the nature of pipes, wherein the shaped charges are configured to be detonated within an oil and gas well in response to a signal; Perforating explosive equipment for use in recompletion perforating applications in unconventional oil and gas wells, namely, perforating guns specially adapted for use with explosive charges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |