Drawing for PRAGMATICALLY TRAINED

USPTO serial 50002904

PRAGMATICALLY TRAINED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRAGMATICALLY TRAINED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam J. Fromm

Adam J. Fromm Clark Hill PLC130 East Randolph StreetSuite 3900Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services in the field of information technology system security; educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, presentations, and retreats in the field of information technology system securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance