USPTO serial 50002963
CLARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CLARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy L. Greywitt
Amy L. Greywitt Smith Baluch LLP77 Newbury St.3rd FloorBoston, MA 02116Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital images; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital images; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital images; (Based on Intent to Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital videos; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital videos; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enhancing the resolution and quality of digital videos | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |