Drawing for CLOUDTEC SPHERE

USPTO serial 50004288

CLOUDTEC SPHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUDTEC SPHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meichelle R. MacGregor

Meichelle R. MacGregor Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; shoes; running shoes; sports shoes; athletic shoes; shoe soles; shoe insoles; insoles; foam rubber soles for footwear; Components of footwear, namely, uppers, outsoles, midsoles, heel counters, insoles and plates incorporated into the midsoles; components of footwear, namely, outsole material and midsole material in the nature of fabric sold as an integral component of finished footwear; cushioning components for footwear, namely polymer insole cushioning and polymer midsole cushioning sold as a component of finished cushioned footwear for non-orthopedic purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance