USPTO serial 50004412
COCOGOODSCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDMAN, NICOLE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 139
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with COCOGOODSCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vinh Long Province, VN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Rixen
Jonathan M. Rixen Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic soaps; bath soaps; perfumed soaps; shampoos; deodorant soap; essential oil used as hair cosmetics; virgin coconut oil used as cosmetics; all of the aforementioned made from coconut | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2018 |
| 029 | Desiccated coconut; virgin coconut oil for food; edible refined coconut oil; coconut milk powder made from juice concentrate; coconut milk; toasted coconut chips; coconut butter | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2018 |
| 032 | Coconut water-based non-alcoholic beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |