USPTO serial 50007335
KORRIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KORRIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for database management; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data assessment; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for developing data science models; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data exploration; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for creating and integrating computer models; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for writing custom algorithms and implementing algorithms into dataflows; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of software implementation for others; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Business technology software consultation services; Consultation services relating to computer software; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |