USPTO serial 50008132
SENTRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SENTRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marin Cionca
Marin Cionca CIONCA IP Law P.C.2030 Main Street STE 1300Irvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for governance of loan underwriting, fraud detection, identity verification, PPP loan verification, mortgage compliance, data and documentation integrity review, risk buffer modeling, audit trail generation, compliance automation, and cross-border regulatory alignment for banks, lenders, and financial institutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Business consultancy relating to risk and regulatory compliance management; Tracking and monitoring regulatory compliance for others for account auditing purposes; Business risk management services; Business risk assessment services; Commercial assistance relating to system implementation and system integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial risk assessment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for governance of loan underwriting, fraud detection, identity verification, PPP loan verification, mortgage compliance, data and documentation integrity review, risk buffer modeling, audit trail generation, compliance automation, and cross-border regulatory alignment for banks, lenders, and financial institutions; Computer technology consultancy; Computer systems integration services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Tracking and monitoring regulatory requirements in the field of banking, lending, and finance for regulatory compliance purposes; Regulatory compliance auditing; Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of banking, lending, and finance; Providing regulatory compliance information in the field of banking, lending, and finance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Owen Delargy
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SENTRIX
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |