USPTO serial 50009630
BEILAIYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NISHIGAYA, CHRISTINE EIKO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEILAIYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anyang City Henan Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joy S. Goudie
Joy S. Goudie Goudie PLLCPO Box 73White Plains, NY 10602United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Wood preservatives; Wood preservatives for fences and other construction purposes; Water-based paints; Dyes for wood; Coatings for wood as paints; Colorants; Oil for the preservation of wood; Wood stains; Preservative coatings for paper and wood surfaces; Wood preserving oils; Paints; Anticorrosive paints; Acrylic paints; Wood lacquers; Paints for use in the manufacture of furniture | ACTIVE | May 22, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |