USPTO serial 50009903
INGENUITY TO THE POWER OF AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIS, BRIAN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with INGENUITY TO THE POWER OF AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Maki
Mark L. Maki Ingenuity Squared PLC9425 E Ts AveVicksburg, MI 49097Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development, and implementation of software for use in the fields of law, technology development, intellectual property, innovation, and branding; Design, development, and implementation of software for analyzing and reporting on public records, administrative records, and regulatory filings; Design, development, and implementation of software for generating intellectual property intelligence data through AI-powered software for use by intellectual property and technology professionals, and creators of brands, technology and intellectual property; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use by legal and technology professionals in the provision of legal services and for generating intellectual property, technology and regulatory intelligence data; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for automated generation of legal intelligence reports and professional document deliverables in the fields of intellectual property and technology law; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for the provision of legal, intellectual property, technology and regulatory services; Innovation consulting services, namely, advising others in the areas of product development; Consulting services in the field of product design and development; Consultation services relating to computer software; Design, development and implementation of software; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in the fields of law, technology, intellectual property, innovation, and branding; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of implementing computer software systems in the fields of law, technology, intellectual property, innovation, and branding; Product research; Searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks for others; Product development; Research, design and development of software using artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |