USPTO serial 50011423
CHRONOSCALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, CATHERINE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CHRONOSCALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLPOne Lowenstein DriveRoseland, NJ 07068United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor chip sets for use in data centers, enabling memory, multiway communications, processing capabilities, etc. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Consulting services in the field of computer hardware design for others training; Consulting services in the field of computer programming design, and maintenance of computer software platforms training | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Planning and layout design services for large-scale compute environments; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Rental of data center facilities; Rental of data processing apparatus; Rental of space in a computer co-location facility for containerized data centers of others; Computer co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting servers for use by others; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting software for operating virtual servers for use by others; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share data; Electronic data storage; Electronic storage services for archiving electronic data; Online data storage; Cloud storage services for electronic data; Cloud storage services for electronic files; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for artificial intelligence workloads; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for dedicated, scalable, customizable infrastructure for high-performance computing; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Providing an on-line network environment featuring technology that enables users to share data in the field of cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |