USPTO serial 50020639
STARFALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with STARFALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Martensen
Michael C. Martensen Martensen IP30 East Kiowa StreetSuite 101Colorado Springs, CO 80903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic systems comprised of computer hardware, downloadable software, and signal processors for denying, degrading, disrupting or otherwise impede access to radio frequency position, navigation, and timing (PNT) signals; computer hardware and downloadable software for PNT jamming, spoofing, and other advanced means of navigation interdiction via radio-frequency links; test and evaluation hardware and downloadable software for the development of counter-PNT systems | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2026 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) for inhibiting navigation systems, namely, providing usage of software for interdiction of position, navigation, and timing (PNT) systems; integration, customization, optimal use analysis, and deployment support of software and hardware solutions to interdict systems relying in any way on PNT; technical consultation, research, and systems engineering for development of counter-PNT systems | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |