Drawing for ULTRA TWIST

USPTO serial 50041799

ULTRA TWIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA TWIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Naresh Kilaru

Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Soap boxes; Tooth brushes, non-electric; Make-up brushes; Deodorising apparatus for personal use, namely, perfume sprayers sold empty, body sponges, fragrance oil burners; Electrical toothbrushes; Electric toothbrush replacement heads; Floss for dental purposes; Water apparatus for cleaning teeth and gums for home use; Toothbrush cases; Electrical applicators for applying cosmetics to the skin; Interdental brushes for cleaning the teethACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance