USPTO serial 50077706
HUMAN CONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, MADELINE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HUMAN CONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carson City, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P Bhatti
Farah P Bhatti Buchalter LLP18400 Von Karman Ave., Suite 800Irvine, CA 92612United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Dating services; Dating services provided via the Internet; Computer dating services; Internet-based dating services; Internet dating services; Internet-based dating and social introduction services; Internet-based social introduction and dating services; Providing a website featuring information regarding dating; Internet-based dating, social introduction and social networking services; Internet-based personal introduction services; Internet-based dating, matchmaking and personal introduction services; Dating and social introduction services provided via online personal advertisements | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |