USPTO serial 50101800
SMART YARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PORTARO, ALEXANDRA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SMART YARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathilde Florenson
Mathilde Florenson T-Rex Law, P.C.7040 Avenida Encinas #104-333Carlsbad, CA 92011United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Providing secure vehicle and trailer staging facilities; providing freight terminal and logistics hub services; providing transportation coordination facilities for commercial vehicle operations; operation of integrated logistics environments featuring vehicle staging, freight handling, transportation support services and operational infrastructure; providing facilities for commercial vehicle parking, staging, and fleet operations; intermodal logistics terminal services; transportation hub services integrating vehicle operations, energy infrastructure, and freight movement; digital infrastructure including edge computing facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |