USPTO serial 71569967
AIRMATIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 1950
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRMATIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PHILADELPHIA, PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan E. Spitz, Timothy D. Pecsenye, Alfred W. Zaher, Cindy A. Elliot, David M. Perry, Emily J. Barnhart, Bruce D. George, Sean W. Dwyer, Lisa Casey Spaniel, and Zachary A. Aria
Megan E. Spitz Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square9th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | PNEUMATIC TOOLS OPERATED BY COMPRESSED AIR, PARTICULARLY HAMMERS FOR SCALING RUST AND CORROSION FROM METAL SURFACES, AND VIBRATORS FOR SHAKING LIQUIDS AND POWDERED SUBSTANCES THROUGH SIEVES, AND THROUGH CONDUITS OR TROUGHS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 1943 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 17, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | PRA9 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 7, 1970 | REN1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 20 YRS) | — |