USPTO serial 72175871
CALIMULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 0789847Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 1965
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALIMULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. Schatz
BRETT A SCHATZ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | EMULSIFIER OF SYNTHETIC POLYMERS AND RUBBER COMPONENTS IN WATER | EXPIRED | Jan 28, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 1985 | REN1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 20 YRS) | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |