CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOUTARDE DE MEAUX POMMERY AROMATISEE AUVINAIGRE FIN HUIC CONDIMENTO EST IMPERARE OMNIBUS CIBIS MUSTAROA MELDENSIS A.D. 1632

USPTO serial 73057624

MOUTARDE DE MEAUX POMMERY AROMATISEE AUVINAIGRE FIN HUIC CONDIMENTO EST IMPERARE OMNIBUS CIBIS MUSTAROA MELDENSIS A.D. 1632

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1639207Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 26, 1991
Examiner
WILLIAMS, RON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MOUTARDE DE MEAUX POMMERY AROMATISEE AUVINAIGRE FIN HUIC CONDIMENTO EST IMPERARE OMNIBUS CIBIS MUSTAROA MELDENSIS A.D. 1632?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030mustardACTIVEJul 30, 1964

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2021NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2021RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 7, 202189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 7, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 3, 2021E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2011RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 31, 201189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 30, 201189AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 30, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 30, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 23, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2011E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 22, 2001RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 22, 200189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 22, 200189AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Oct 30, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 26, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Jul 20, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 1981CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1980CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1979CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 1978CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1978CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1977CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1976CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1976CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 1975CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance