USPTO serial 73165059
HAPPY COOKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPPY COOKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BURTON L. LILLING
ATTN: BURTON L LILLING LILLING & GREENSPAN123 MAIN STWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | KITCHEN UTENSILS-NAMELY, POTS, PANS, SMALL APPARATUS FOR MINCING, GRINDING AND PRESSING, MIXING BOWLS, BAKING PANS AND (NON-ELECTRIC) COFFEE PERCOLATORS | ABANDONED | Jun 23, 1974 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1984 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1982 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1978 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1978 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |