USPTO serial 73174348
C COURTLEIGH SATIN LEAF CIGARETTES SPECIAL MILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C COURTLEIGH SATIN LEAF CIGARETTES SPECIAL MILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald A. Kaul
BROWNSTEIN, ZEIDMAN & SCHOMERSTE 9001025 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARETTES | ABANDONED | Jan 2, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by St. Regis Tobacco Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks owned by St. Regis Tobacco Corporation Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named C COURTLEIGH SATIN LEAF CIGARETTES SPECIAL MILD
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 1985 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1983 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1983 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1983 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |