USPTO serial 73183269
SUPER LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPER LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HIROSHIMA-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS
WASHINGTON SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN & MACPEAK & SEAS1776 K ST N W, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FISHING REELS AND FISHING RODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1979 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1978 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |