Drawing for THE REPERTORY DANCE THEATRE

USPTO serial 73195724

THE REPERTORY DANCE THEATRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE REPERTORY DANCE THEATRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT R. MALLINCKRODT

SALT LAKE CITY MALLINCKRODT & MALLINCKRODT10 EXCHANGE PL, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041PROVIDINGENTERTAINMENT THROUGH THE PRESENTATION OT THE PUBLIC OF PROGR PROGRAMS OF MODERN DANCE, AND FOR PROVIDING EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF MODERN DANCE THROUGH THE PRESENTATION OFCLASSES AND WORKSHOPS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF MODERN DANCEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 1984ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 1984EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 1984EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 10, 1984CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 29, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 1983EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 1983CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 27, 1983CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1980CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1979DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1979DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance