USPTO serial 73195742
EMILIO PUCCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1675914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 1992
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMILIO PUCCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIRENZE, IT
FIRENZE, IT
FIRENZE, IT
FIRENZE, IT
EMILIO PUCCI PERFUMES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI PERFUMES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE C. MAX
THEODORE C MAX MINTZ LEVIN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO PCCHRYSLER CTR 666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CHILDREN'S CLOTHING; NAMELY, [CLOTH DIAPER PANTS, ROMPERS,] LOUNGE ROBES, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, PANTS, DRESSES, [RAINCOATS], JACKETS [AND SUITS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI PERFUMES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named EMILIO PUCCI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1979 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |