Drawing for THE EDWARDS MYO-FLEX

USPTO serial 73202624

THE EDWARDS MYO-FLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1217421Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 23, 1982
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE EDWARDS MYO-FLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond L. Poston, Jr.

RAYMOND L POSTON JR1762 CHURCH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electro-Vibratory Stimulator for Muscle TreatmentSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1952

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1987CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 22, 1987C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 11, 1987CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 1986PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 1982R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 1982PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 1982NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 1982CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 1979CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1979DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1979DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance