USPTO serial 73213614
PASTAMATIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PASTAMATIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gessate, (Milano), IT
Gessate, (Milano), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hubbell, Cohen, Stiefel & Gross
551 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine for Making Pasta | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1994 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1987 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 1982 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1982 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 1982 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1982 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1980 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1979 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |